 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following eigenproblems are typical, both because they arise naturally in applications and because we have good algorithms for them:
 for some specified set of subscripts
 for some specified set of subscripts 
 , 
including the special cases of the largest
, 
including the special cases of the largest  eigenvalues
 eigenvalues 
 through
 through
 , and the smallest
, and the smallest  eigenvalues
 eigenvalues  through
 through  .
Again, the desired accuracy may be specified.
.
Again, the desired accuracy may be specified.
![$[\alpha, \beta]$](img202.png) . Again, the desired accuracy may be specified.
. Again, the desired accuracy may be specified.
![$[\alpha, \beta]$](img202.png) .
This does not require computing the eigenvalues in
.
This does not require computing the eigenvalues in 
![$[\alpha, \beta]$](img202.png) , 
and so can be much cheaper.
, 
and so can be much cheaper.
 .
.
For each of these possibilities (except 4) the user can also compute the corresponding eigenvectors. For the eigenvalues that are clustered together, the user may choose to compute the associated invariant subspace, since in this case the individual eigenvectors can be very ill-conditioned, while the invariant subspace may be less so. Finally, for any of these quantities, the user might also want to compute its condition number.
Even though we have effective algorithms for these problems, we cannot necessarily solve all large scale problems in an amount of time and space acceptable to all users.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
