next up previous contents index
Next: 7.4 Statistical Gravitational Lensing Up: 7 Independent Parallelism Previous: 7.2.5 Conclusion

7.3 Numerical Study of High-T Spin Systems


Although the mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity  is not yet established, an enormous amount of experimental work has been completed on these materials and, as a result, a ``magnetic''  explanation has probably gained the largest number of adherents. In this picture, high-temperature superconductivity results from the effects of dynamical holes on the magnetic properties of planes, perhaps through the formation of bound hole pairs. In the undoped materials (``precursor insulators''), these planes are magnetic insulators and appear to be well described by the two-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, 

where each spin represents a d-electron on a site. Since many aspects of the two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet were obscure before the discovery of high-T, this model has been the subject of intense numerical study, and comparisons with experiments on the precursor insulators have generally been successful. (A review of this subject including recent references has been prepared for the group [Barnes:91a].) If the proposed ``magnetic'' origin of high-temperature superconductivity is correct, one may only need to incorporate dynamical holes in the Heisenberg antiferromagnet to construct a model that exhibits high-temperature superconductivity. Unfortunately, such models (for example, the ``t-J'' model) are dynamical many-fermion systems and exhibit the ``minus sign problem'' which makes them very difficult to simulate on large lattices using Monte Carlo techniques. The lack of appropriate algorithms for many-fermion systems accounts in large part for the uncertainty in the predictions of these models.

In our work, we carried out numerical simulations of the low-lying states of one- and two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnets; the problems we studied on the hypercube which relate to high-T systems were the determination of low-lying energies and ground state matrix elements of the two-dimensional spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, and in particular the response of the ground state to anisotropic couplings in the generalized model

Until recently, the possible existence of infinite-range spin antialignment ``staggered magnetization'' in the ground state of the two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet, which would imply spontaneous breaking of rotational symmetry, was considered an open question. Since the precursor insulators such as are observed to have a nonzero staggered magnetization, one might hope to observe it in the Heisenberg model as well. (It has actually been proven to be zero in the isotropic model above zero temperature, so this is a very delicate kind of long-range order.) Assuming that such order exists, one might expect to see various kinds of singular behavior in response to anisotropies, which would choose a preferred direction for symmetry breaking in the ground state. In our numerical simulations we measured the ground state energy per spin , the energy gap to the first spin excitation , and the component of the staggered magnetization N, as a function of the anisotropy parameter g on LL square lattices, extrapolated to the bulk limit. We did indeed find evidence of singular behavior at the isotropic point g=1, specifically that is probably discontinuous there (Figure 7.8), decreases to zero at g=1 (Figure 7.9) and remains zero for g>1, and N decreases to a nonzero limit as g approaches one, is zero for g>1, and is undefined at g=1 ([Barnes:89a;89c]). Finite lattice results which led to this conclusion are shown in Figure 7.10. (Perturbative and spin-wave predictions also appear in these figures; details are discussed in the publications we have cited.) These results are consistent with a ``spin flop'' transition, in which the long-range spin order is oriented along the energetically most favorable direction, which changes discontinuously from to planar as g passes through the isotropic point. The qualitative behavior of the energy gap can be understood as a consequence of Goldstone's theorem, given these types of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Our results also provided interesting tests of spin-wave theory, which has been applied to the study of many antiferromagnetic systems including the two-dimensional Heisenberg model, but is of questionable accuracy for small spin. In this spin-1/2 case, we found that finite-size and anisotropic effects were qualitatively described surprisingly well by spin-wave theory, but that actual numerical values were sometimes rather inaccurate; for example, the energy gap due to a small easy-axis anisotropy was in error by about a factor of two.

Figure 7.8: Ground State Energy per Spin

Figure 7.9: Spin Excitation Energy Gap

In related work, we developed hypercube programs to study static holes in the Heisenberg model, as a first step towards more general Monte Carlo investigations of the behavior of holes in antiferromagnets. Preliminary static-hole results have been published [Barnes:90b], and our collaboration is now continuing to study high-T models on an Intel iPSC/860 hypercube at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

For our studies on the Caltech machine, we used the DGRW (discrete guided random-walk) Monte Carlo  algorithm [Barnes:88c], and incorporated algorithm improvements which lowered the statistical errors [Barnes:89b]. This algorithm solves the Euclidean time Schrödinger equation stochastically by running random walks in the configuration space of the system and accumulating a weight factor, which implicitly contains energies and matrix elements. Since the algorithm only requires a single configuration, our memory requirements were very small, and we simply placed a copy of the program on each node; no internode communication was necessary. A previously developed DGRW spin system Fortran program written by T. Barnes was rewritten in C and adapted to the hypercube by D. Kotchan, and an independent DGRW code was written by E. S. Swanson for debugging  purposes. Our collaboration for this work eventually grew to include K. J. Cappon (who also wrote a DGRW Monte Carlo code) and E. Dagotto (UCSB/ITP) and A. Moreo (UCSB), who wrote Lanczos programs to give essentially exact results on the lattice. This provided an independent check of the accuracy of our Monte Carlo results.

Figure 7.10: Ground State Staggered Magnetization

In addition to providing resources that led to these physics results, access to the hypercube and the support of the group were very helpful in the PhD programs of D. Kotchan and E. S. Swanson, and their experience has encouraged several other graduate-level theorists at the University of Toronto to pursue studies in computational physics, in the areas of high-temperature superconductivity (K. J. Cappon and W. MacReady) and Monte Carlo studies of quark model physics (G. Grondin).

next up previous contents index
Next: 7.4 Statistical Gravitational Lensing Up: 7 Independent Parallelism Previous: 7.2.5 Conclusion

Guy Robinson
Wed Mar 1 10:19:35 EST 1995