џWPCу ћџ2џџB@P ZІCourier 10cpiCourier 10cpiCourier 10cpi (Land)Line Printer 16.67cpi (Land)џўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџHP LaserJet Series II (Additional)HLSEIIAD.PRSлx Œ @Щ‡Я,№t0ЮЅX@ћџ2Џ 24XWџџžв#|xurier 10cpi (Land)џџ‰?xxx,ћMєxў6X@Щ“8Ч;X@ўўўўўўўџџџџџўџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ>џџ‰?xxx,Дpєxў6X@Щ BЧ;X@ўўўўўўџџџџџўџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџВџџk+HHH,#:lЉH ЊH@ŽУіЧ;Љ@ўўўўўўўџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџ             шvwE}- %‚vˆv     оvШv\}+)І`}†vћџ2сд k+ да ї3и'3и'Standardи'3и'3Standardnal)HLSEIIAD.PRSлx Œ žвААААї аа ААt аа АА№, аУУ0 SYMMETRIC INDSCAL Paul Green'S artificial data ; 3 subjects and 15 stimuli ************************************************** PARAMETERS DIM IRDATA ITMAX IPUNCH IPLOT IRN 2 3 10 0 0 0 NO. OF MATRICES = 3 NO. OF STIM. = 15 ************************************************** INITIAL STIMULUS MATRIX 1 -1.180 -1.180 -.740 .060 .930 1.430 1.060 .310 -.620 -1.180 .430 .930 1.430 -1.180 -1.180 2 .650 1.460 1.460 1.460 1.110 .290 -.170 -.170 -.290 -.290 -.410 -.990 -1.630 -.930 -1.930 HISTORY OF COMPUTATION ITERATION CORRELATIONS BETWEEN VAF LOSS Y(DATA) AND YHAT (R**2) (Y-YHAT)**2 0 .998347 .996697 .003303 1 .999585 .999171 .000830 2 .999894 .999789 .000211 3 .999972 .999944 .000056 4 .999991 .999982 .000018 5 .999996 .999992 .000008 6 .999997 .999994 .000006 7 .999997 .999995 .000005 REACHED CRITERION ON ITERATION 7 FINAL .999997 .999995 .000005 NORMALIZED SOLUTION SUBJECTS WEIGHT MATRIX 1 1.000 .924 .704 2 .000 .371 .701 STIMULUS MATRIX 1 -.292 -.292 -.179 .027 .251 .380 .285 .092 -.148 -.292 .122 .251 .380 -.292 -.292 2 .163 .364 .364 .363 .278 .077 -.034 -.036 -.064 -.065 -.094 -.236 -.392 -.221 -.465 NORMALIZED SUM OF PRODUCTS (SUBJECTS) 1 1.000 2 .688 1.000 SUM OF PRODUCTS (STIMULI) 1 1.000 2 -.114 1.000 APPROXIMATE PROPORTION OF TOTAL VARIANCE ACCOUNTED FOR BY EACH DIMENSION 1 2 .789 .211 CORRELATION BETWEEN COMPUTED SCORES AND SCALAR PROD. FOR SUBJECTS 1 .999999 2 .999996 3 .999997д \%\%\%д WEIGHTS SPACE DIMENSION 2 (Y-AXIS) VS. DIMENSION 1 (X-AXIS) Paul Green'S artificial data ; 3 subjects and 15 stimuli -1.0000 -.5000 .0000 .5000 1.0000 *.************************.************************.************************.************************.* 1.0000 . I . 1.0000 * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I C * * I * * I * * I * * I * .5000 . I . .5000 * I * * I * * I B * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * .0000 .--------------------------------------------------I--------------------------------------------------. .0000 * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * -.5000 . I . -.5000 * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * * I * -1.0000 . I . -1.0000 *.************************.************************.************************.************************.* -1.0000 -.5000 .0000 .5000 1.0000дќ!\%\%\%д STIMULUS SPACE DIMENSION 2 (Y-AXIS) VS. DIMENSION 1 (X-AXIS) Paul Green'S artificial data ; 3 subjects and 15 stimuli -.500 -.400 -.300 -.200 -.100 .000 .100 .200 .300 .400 .500 *.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.* .5000 . I . .5000 * I * * I * * I * * I * .4000 . I . .4000 * I * * B C I D * * I * * I * .3000 . I . .3000 * I E * * I * * I * * I * .2000 . I . .2000 * I * * A I * * I * * I * .1000 . I . .1000 * I F * * I * * I * * I * .0000 .--------------------------------------------------I--------------------------------------------------. .0000 * I * * I H G * * J I I * * I * -.1000 . I K . -.1000 * I * * I * * I * * I * -.2000 . I . -.2000 * N I * * I L * * I * * I * -.3000 . I . -.3000 * I * * I * * I * * I * -.4000 . I M . -.4000 * I * * I * * O I * * I * -.5000 . I . -.5000 * I * * I * *.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.*********.* -.500 -.400 -.300 -.200 -.100 .000 .100 .200 .300 .400 .500 ФФ